Childrens Lighthouse - Jordan Ranch

Nine staff employed after 9/1/23 did not have the required affidavit form 2912 (Pre-employment affidavit).

One caregivers education document was written in a foreign language and did not meet the standard.

Based on the preponderance of evidence gathered during the investigation, there is sufficient evidence to prove the operation did not adhere to the established procedures for releasing children as outlined in their operational policies.

Based on the results and information reported during the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to support a child who was not officially enrolled at the center was placed inside of a classroom to be cared for without required admissions information.

The operation director or Designee did not have a current children's product safety certification available for review during the inspection.

Regarding Transportation training: Two caregivers had expired transportation training Two caregivers did not have transportation available for review One caregiver had a transportation certificate but with no documented hours.

4 out of 10 caregivers did not have the required pediatric CPR training available for review. 1 out of 10 caregiver(s) had an expired CPR training.

One staff who transport children for the operation have an expired drivers license.

One out ten children did not have a physical address for the emergency contact.

4 out of 10 caregivers did not have the required pediatric first aid training available for review. 1 out of 10 caregiver(s) had an expired first aid training.

Personnel records reviewed were missing the following: - Two staff did not have a date of hire - Two staff did not have proof of education - One staff did not have copy of ID - Two staff did not have notarized employment affidavit

The operation has not designated a qualified director.

Medication for three children in care was not in the original container, and not labeled with the date of entry to the center.

Three children in care had expired medication (epi pen exp 2/22/23, inhaler exp 1/23, and allergy medication exp 4/22).

Three out of ten children were missing emergency contact information/address. Two children out of ten did not have admissions date.

Based on sufficient evidence obtained during the DFPS investigation there is a preponderance of evidence to show that a caregiver was on their cell phone during a time they should have been supervising children.

Based on sufficient evidence obtained during the DFPS investigation there is a preponderance of evidence to show that a child was left outside alone.

Based on sufficient evidence obtained during the DFPS investigation there is a preponderance of evidence to show that caregivers did not use the tracking system made available to them.

There is sufficient evidence to show that a child in care was not accounted for in the electronic system used by the operation.

There is sufficient evidence to show that a child in care was left outside alone.

There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver did leave a child outside alone and unsupervised.

The operation did not report to licensing an incident where a child was left unsupervised outside near the playground area.

The operation did not notify the parent of the incident until 5 days after the biting incident took place.

The operation did not have a current fire inspection available during the inspection. The last one was in 2020.

The operation did not have a current consumer product safety commission form available during the inspection.

The brick column on the outdoor patio was missing bricks, which left the column having exposed sharp edges, and made it an unsafe environment for the children. (picture was taken).