Lil' Munchkins Child Care Center
Lil' Munchkins Child Care Center is a licensed child care center in San Antonio, TX, licensed for up to 115 children and serving infants through school-age children. It has held its Texas license since 2018. Since October 2021, state inspectors have visited 42 times and investigated 7 reports. Inspectors recorded 62 citations, 19 of them high-risk, most often for building & playground safety (13 of 62). 4 citations came in the last 12 months, including 1 high-risk. 10% were corrected during the inspection itself. Measured by risk-weighted citations per inspection, it is tied for #388 of 476 centers in San Antonio and better than 15% of licensed centers statewide.
Inspection record
Every state visit
What inspectors cited most
Citations, newest first
Three out of four files evaluated did not have Handling Hazardous Materials training available for review.
According to the Texas Comptroller website, the business entity's Franchise Tax Account Status is Inactive/Forfeited. The operation is currently providing care to children with an inactive status.
The operation did not report the number of employees who left from the prior year by 01/15/26.
At time of inspection, infant class had five children to one caregiver, specified age group was eleven months. Class was out of ratio by one child. This was corrected at inspection as a second caregiver was placed in the class.
At time of inspection, cleaning solutions were observed at children's reach. At time of inspection, diaper creams were observed in children's reach. At time of inspection, a potty chair was observed to not be sanitized. This was corrected during inspection.
The Twos room had 12 children with one caregiver. The specified age group was two. This was corrected at inspection when a child was moved to another room.
Based on the DFPS investigation, the operation failed to notify Child Care Regulation within the required 48 hours of a child being left unsupervised in a transportation van.
The director was aware of a child being left unsupervised in a transportation van and chose not to report the incident to Child Care Regulation.
Based on the DFPS investigation, a child was left unsupervised in a locked van for 2 hours.
Based on the DFPS investigation, the operation did not complete an accident report for a child who was left unsupervised in a transportation van within 48 hours of the incident occurring.
Based on the DFPS investigation and observation of the caregiver re-enacting transportation procedures, it was determined the caregiver did not walk to the back of the van to ensure there were no children in the last seat.
Based on the DFPS investigation, a caregiver exercised poor judgment when the caregiver, at the time of transportation pick up, did not verify with either the parent or school whether a child went home sick from school that day.
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.
Based on the DFPS investigation, the caregiver did not account for all the children in the transportation van prior to exiting the vehicle.
Two of ten staff files audited did not have first aid training.
Two of ten staff files audited did not have affidavits on file.
A wall in the Pre-K room had peeling paint and exposed drywall.
One of ten staff files audited did not have proof of educational requirements.
Two of ten staff files audited did not have CPR training.
The Pre-K class had 20 children, whose ages ranged from three to four years, with one caregiver. The specified age group was four. This was corrected at inspection when a second caregiver came into the room.
Infant daily reports were not being provided in a written or electronic format.
An infant was asleep in a crib while swaddled. This was corrected when the caregiver removed the child from the swaddle.
Seven of seven staff had expired first aid certificates.
A child who was injured was taken to the hospital for treatment and Child Care Regulation was not notified.
Evacuation and relocation diagrams were not posted in each classroom.
A new swing set was installed. The center beam height is over eight feet. The rear use zone is 14 feet. The children will not use the swings until this deficiency is corrected.
A piece of climbing equipment with a height of 24 inches was placed over grass.
The outside exit to the playground was locked from the outside. This was corrected at inspection when the lock was turned to be accessed from inside the playground.
A classroom was observed to be have cots tightly placed with no aisles for a walk or work space. This was corrected at inspection when a discussion was had about cot placement.
Based on the information gathered, caregivers did not use positive methods of discipline and guidance when redirecting children and putting them in time out.
Based off the DFPS investigation, several children stated that a caregiver would yell at them at the operation.
Based off of the DFPS investigation, a caregiver was found reason to believe for sexual abuse. A child made an outcry of being inappropriately touched by the caregiver while in care at the center.
Based off of the DFPS investigation, children cleaned tables using chemicals while in care at the operation. And, based off of the DFPS investigation, a caregiver provided a personal tablet to children with a pixelated video of nude people.
Based off the DFPS investigation a caregiver fell asleep while directly supervising children.
A statement promoting active play was not present in the operational policies.
Nine of ten children's files did not have addresses listed for the emergency contacts.
A current employee list was not posted. This was corrected at inspection when a new list was posted.
It was determined through the course of the investigation that a caregiver transported children without having taken the transportation safety training.
There were scissors and a thermometer missing from the first aid kit located in the vehicle to transport children. Note: There was a staff member that grabbed a thermometer and scissors from the operation and put them in the vehicle's first aid kit to make it complete.
There was a piece of playground equipment was cracked and broken. Additionally there was metal pieces from a fence that were found on the grass area on the playground.
A classroom was observed to be out of ratio when a group of children with a specified age group of 0-11 months old was observed to have 6 children with one caregiver. The maximum number of children allowed for one caregiver for this age group is 4 children. Note: The director entered the classroom to be counted in ratio. A classroom was observed to be out of ratio when a group of children with a specified age group of 3 years old was observed to have 22 children with one caregiver. The maximum number of children allowed for one caregiver would be 15 children for this age group. Note: There were some parents that picked up their children to make the classroom in ratio.
There was a strand of barbed wire that was on the operation's side of the fence. The barbed wire is sharp and rusty.
A classroom was observed to be out of ratio when a group of children with a specified age group of 12-18 months was observed to have 15 children with two caregivers. The maximum group size for two or more caregivers for this specified age group is two caregivers to 12 children. Note: This was corrected when 3 children were moved to another classroom making the classroom in ratio. A classroom was observed to be out of ratio when a group of children with a specified age group of 5 to 12 years old was observed to have 40 children with two caregivers. The maximum group size for two or more caregivers for this specified age group is two caregivers to 35 children. Note: Parents were picking up children and 5 children were picked up making the classroom in ratio.
There was a wall located in the hallway next to the restrooms, that had a hole towards the bottom of the wall.
There was a fence located towards the backside of the playground, that was leaning over. With the fence leaning over it created a huge gap/opening. Additionally there were some rusty wires that were trying to hold the fence in place, but with it leaning the wires were exposed.
A classroom was observed to be out of ratio when a group of children with a specified age group of 5 years old was observed to have 24 children with one caregiver. The caregiver to child ratio for this specified age group for one teacher is 22 children. The operation corrected this at inspection when an afternoon caregiver arrived to make the clasrsroom in ratio.
A classroom was observed to be out of ratio when a group of children with a specified age group of 3 years old was observed to have 27 children with one caregiver. The caregiver to child ratio for this specified age group for one teacher is 15 children. The operation corrected this at inspection when the caregiver that immediately returned on bus run was added to ratio making the classroom compliant.
A classroom was observed to be out of ratio when a group of children with a specified age group of 0-11 months old was observed to have 12 children with two caregivers. The caregiver to child ratio for this specified age group for two teachers is 10 children. The operation corrected this when two children were picked up for the day making the classroom compliant.
The first aid kit was missing twizzers to make the kit complete.
There was a gap of more than 4 inches where the fence did not meet the pavement on the toddler outdoor play area.
There was not an updated fire inspection that was completed for the current year. The last inspection was completed on 9/22/2020.
There were five employee files that were viewed. There were three employee files that did not have a notarized affidavit available for review.
There were two out of the five children records that did not have the address of an emergency contact.
None of the cribs in the infant room where labeled with each child's name.
There were four out of the five children records that were missing their admission date.
There was a disinfectant solution underneath a sink in the school age classroom. Also in all the bathrooms there was a plunger,toilet scrub brush accessible to children, and trash cans without lids. Note: This was corrected at inspection when the operation's director removed all toilet scrub brushes, plungers, cleaning supplies, and trash cans from all the restrooms.
There were no updated infant feeding schedules for this month, available upon review.
There were four out of the five employee files that did not have 24 hours of annual training available for review.
The center director did not have the annual 30 hours of completed training available for review.
There were two out of the five children files that did not have a parent signature on the enrollment forms.
There were two out of the five children files viewed that did not have their authorization for medical treatment completed in their enrollment paperwork.
There were two children files out of the five children files viewed that did not have updated immunization records available for review.
About this center
Common questions
Does Lil' Munchkins Child Care Center take infants?
Yes. Texas licenses it to care for infants through school-age children.
What are Lil' Munchkins Child Care Center’s hours?
6:30 AM to 6 PM, Monday through Friday, according to its state licensing record. Confirm holiday and summer hours with the center.
Does Lil' Munchkins Child Care Center accept child care subsidies?
Yes, according to its state licensing record.
How much does Lil' Munchkins Child Care Center cost?
Texas does not publish individual centers’ prices, so ask Lil' Munchkins Child Care Center for its current tuition. For comparison, the median full-day price at licensed centers in the Alamo area, which includes San Antonio, is $42.00 a day for infants, $40.40 a day for toddlers and $39.20 a day for 3-year-olds (2025 Texas Child Care Market Rate Survey).
Has Lil' Munchkins Child Care Center had any serious violations?
Inspectors recorded 19 high-risk citations since 2021. The most recent was on Jul 8, 2026: “Franchise Tax Delinquent.” Each one is listed in full above.
How does Lil' Munchkins Child Care Center compare with other daycares in San Antonio?
It is tied for #388 of 476 centers in San Antonio by risk-weighted citations per inspection, and is better than 15% of licensed centers statewide (out of 9,147 Texas centers with enough inspection history).
When was Lil' Munchkins Child Care Center last inspected?
Aug 24, 2026. Inspectors cited at least one rule during that visit.
Licensed centers nearby
620 McIlvaine, San Antonio · 0.2 mi away · 130 spotsFewer citations than mostBaby Boss Learning Center
4704 San Pedro Ave, San Antonio · 0.3 mi away · 81 spotsMore citations than mostBrighton Center
265 E Lullwood Ave, San Antonio · 0.8 mi away · 55 spotsMore citations than mostUniversity Presbyterian Children
300 Bushnell Ave, San Antonio · 1.0 mi away · 124 spotsAbout typicalY School Age @ Twain
2411 San Pedro Ave, San Antonio · 1.1 mi away · 200 spotsAbout typicalTies-N-Bows
1334 Basse Rd, San Antonio · 1.1 mi away · 27 spotsMore citations than most
Citations are quoted from Texas HHS inspection records. Many are corrected the same day, and a citation is a finding about one rule, not a judgment about a center overall.
To see the official record, search operation 1673753 on Search Texas Child Care. Data refreshed Sep 30, 2026.